<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 773 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants in the appeal against the differential duty demand on iron ore export. It held that the Commissioner should have allowed the re-test request by the Central Revenue Control Laboratory, as denying it violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Tribunal vacated the order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after re-testing the sample, ensuring the exporter&#039;s right to be heard. The denial of the re-test request by the Commissioner was deemed unjustified and in violation of natural justice principles, leading to the vacating of the impugned order and a remand for a fair assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 773 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants in the appeal against the differential duty demand on iron ore export. It held that the Commissioner should have allowed the re-test request by the Central Revenue Control Laboratory, as denying it violated principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Tribunal vacated the order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision after re-testing the sample, ensuring the exporter&#039;s right to be heard. The denial of the re-test request by the Commissioner was deemed unjustified and in violation of natural justice principles, leading to the vacating of the impugned order and a remand for a fair assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>