https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154896 The Tribunal dismissed the applications and appeals in Excise Appeal Nos. 844 & 845 of 2009 due to the applicants' failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple opportunities and no valid reasons provided for non-compliance, the Tribunal emphasized the legal consequence of dismissal for failing to meet the pre-deposit orders. The absence of a stay granted by the High Court further supported the dismissal of the appeals to uphold the legal mandate. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:32:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154896 The Tribunal dismissed the applications and appeals in Excise Appeal Nos. 844 & 845 of 2009 due to the applicants' failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple opportunities and no valid reasons provided for non-compliance, the Tribunal emphasized the legal consequence of dismissal for failing to meet the pre-deposit orders. The absence of a stay granted by the High Court further supported the dismissal of the appeals to uphold the legal mandate. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154896