<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 858 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154889</link>
    <description>The appellate authority&#039;s power to remand for fresh consideration of penalty was upheld where it did not finally decide the penalty issue but directed reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the order setting aside the penalty and remanding the matter, because the remand was limited to fresh examination of invoices issued in relation to confiscated goods with different descriptions and values. The Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore entitled to send the penalty question back for reconsideration, and the challenge to that course failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:27:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 858 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154889</link>
      <description>The appellate authority&#039;s power to remand for fresh consideration of penalty was upheld where it did not finally decide the penalty issue but directed reconsideration by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the order setting aside the penalty and remanding the matter, because the remand was limited to fresh examination of invoices issued in relation to confiscated goods with different descriptions and values. The Commissioner (Appeals) was therefore entitled to send the penalty question back for reconsideration, and the challenge to that course failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>