https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154887 The tribunal allowed the appeal by the sugar mill, finding that the appellant did not owe additional duty for diverted sugar quantities as they had already paid the appropriate duty. The tribunal also determined that the appellant did not receive compensation from the Government for the diverted sugar, concluding that the appellant did not benefit at the Government's expense. The original authority's decision dropping the duty demand was upheld, overturning the lower appellate authority's decision. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154887 The tribunal allowed the appeal by the sugar mill, finding that the appellant did not owe additional duty for diverted sugar quantities as they had already paid the appropriate duty. The tribunal also determined that the appellant did not receive compensation from the Government for the diverted sugar, concluding that the appellant did not benefit at the Government's expense. The original authority's decision dropping the duty demand was upheld, overturning the lower appellate authority's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154887