https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154886 The Tribunal allowed the stay petition and quashed the detention order issued by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's duty demand confirmation concerning physician samples manufactured on a job work basis was assessed in accordance with Rule 4 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, resulting in a penalty equal to duty and interest. The Tribunal, considering the amounts already deposited by the appellants, unconditionally granted the stay petition, directing the immediate clearance of held-up goods and withdrawal of the detention order. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:20:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154886 The Tribunal allowed the stay petition and quashed the detention order issued by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's duty demand confirmation concerning physician samples manufactured on a job work basis was assessed in accordance with Rule 4 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, resulting in a penalty equal to duty and interest. The Tribunal, considering the amounts already deposited by the appellants, unconditionally granted the stay petition, directing the immediate clearance of held-up goods and withdrawal of the detention order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154886