<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154867</link>
    <description>An appeal was held incomplete because the appellant failed to annex the impugned show cause notice, which was treated as a foundational document needed to identify the allegations and assess the submissions. The Tribunal noted that the proceeding originates from the notice and that even appellate argument requires that document. Despite opportunities to produce it, the appellants did not file the notice, so the appeal could not be examined on merits and was dismissed for non-compliance with filing requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:44:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154867</link>
      <description>An appeal was held incomplete because the appellant failed to annex the impugned show cause notice, which was treated as a foundational document needed to identify the allegations and assess the submissions. The Tribunal noted that the proceeding originates from the notice and that even appellate argument requires that document. Despite opportunities to produce it, the appellants did not file the notice, so the appeal could not be examined on merits and was dismissed for non-compliance with filing requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>