<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 814 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154856</link>
    <description>The duty demand for the Vanaspati shortage was upheld, but the penalty was reduced. The confiscation of the seized oil and tanker, duty demand on the seized oil, and penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act were set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 814 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154856</link>
      <description>The duty demand for the Vanaspati shortage was upheld, but the penalty was reduced. The confiscation of the seized oil and tanker, duty demand on the seized oil, and penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act were set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>