<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 318 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154854</link>
    <description>Assessment and penalty orders remained valid because repeated notices, appearances, adjournments, and service on the business manager established adequate opportunity, while the assessee failed to provide explanations. Penalties for non-furnishing of returns and concealment of turnover operated independently and could be imposed together in a best judgment assessment. Transport charges were properly included in taxable turnover because the account records did not substantiate separate freight billing and the assessee did not produce bill books to prove exclusion from the sale price. The writ petition failed, and the assessment and penalty orders were sustained with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:56:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 318 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154854</link>
      <description>Assessment and penalty orders remained valid because repeated notices, appearances, adjournments, and service on the business manager established adequate opportunity, while the assessee failed to provide explanations. Penalties for non-furnishing of returns and concealment of turnover operated independently and could be imposed together in a best judgment assessment. Transport charges were properly included in taxable turnover because the account records did not substantiate separate freight billing and the assessee did not produce bill books to prove exclusion from the sale price. The writ petition failed, and the assessment and penalty orders were sustained with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>