<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 763 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow interest on the adjusted refund amount from 14-7-04 till the date of payment. The lack of authorization for filing the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was noted but not considered significant as the appeal was primarily dismissed based on the grounds of interest payment correctness. The Tribunal found the initial refund issuance for only a partial amount to be incorrect, ruling that interest on the full refund amount should have been paid initially, as the demands against which the refund was adjusted were subsequently set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 763 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow interest on the adjusted refund amount from 14-7-04 till the date of payment. The lack of authorization for filing the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was noted but not considered significant as the appeal was primarily dismissed based on the grounds of interest payment correctness. The Tribunal found the initial refund issuance for only a partial amount to be incorrect, ruling that interest on the full refund amount should have been paid initially, as the demands against which the refund was adjusted were subsequently set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>