https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154846 A reference under section 42(1) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act could not be refused merely because the Tribunal had adopted what it considered the correct view of law, unless the issue was already directly covered by binding High Court or Supreme Court authority. The question whether tubular trusses fell within a statutory entry under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act was itself a question of law fit for reference, while the first proposed question was only argumentative. The Tribunal was therefore directed to refer the formulated question to the High Court. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154846 A reference under section 42(1) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act could not be refused merely because the Tribunal had adopted what it considered the correct view of law, unless the issue was already directly covered by binding High Court or Supreme Court authority. The question whether tubular trusses fell within a statutory entry under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act was itself a question of law fit for reference, while the first proposed question was only argumentative. The Tribunal was therefore directed to refer the formulated question to the High Court. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 08 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154846