https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154824 The appeal was disposed of with the imposition of a penalty under Rule 25 for removal of excisable goods without payment of duty. Cenvat credit was allowed on actual quantities received, with a restriction to the quantity from the supplier who had not availed Cenvat credit. The matter was remanded for quantification of the credit, affirming the duty demand on tractor parts while setting aside the penalty. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:05:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154824 The appeal was disposed of with the imposition of a penalty under Rule 25 for removal of excisable goods without payment of duty. Cenvat credit was allowed on actual quantities received, with a restriction to the quantity from the supplier who had not availed Cenvat credit. The matter was remanded for quantification of the credit, affirming the duty demand on tractor parts while setting aside the penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154824