<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 342 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154821</link>
    <description>Section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was treated as wide enough to permit reopening of a completed assessment where a later judicial pronouncement showed that the original levy had proceeded on an incorrect legal basis. On that footing, raw hides and skins could be brought to tax at the purchase point, and the reopening was upheld as valid. However, the revised assessment could not stand fully because the inclusion of opening stock and the enhanced valuation of local purchases lacked adequate explanation on the record. Those factual components were remitted for fresh consideration after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 342 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154821</link>
      <description>Section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was treated as wide enough to permit reopening of a completed assessment where a later judicial pronouncement showed that the original levy had proceeded on an incorrect legal basis. On that footing, raw hides and skins could be brought to tax at the purchase point, and the reopening was upheld as valid. However, the revised assessment could not stand fully because the inclusion of opening stock and the enhanced valuation of local purchases lacked adequate explanation on the record. Those factual components were remitted for fresh consideration after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>