<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 454 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154809</link>
    <description>An appellate authority under section 9(3)(a)(ii) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 may vary an assessment only within the subject-matter of the dealer&#039;s appeal. Where the assessee did not challenge the rate of tax on cashmilon, that part of the assessment attained finality and could not be enhanced in appeal merely because the statute refers to variation &quot;otherwise&quot;. Reopening a final assessment at a higher rate lay under section 21, while suo motu revision belonged to the Commissioner under section 10-B. The appellate enhancement on the unappealed portion was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 454 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154809</link>
      <description>An appellate authority under section 9(3)(a)(ii) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 may vary an assessment only within the subject-matter of the dealer&#039;s appeal. Where the assessee did not challenge the rate of tax on cashmilon, that part of the assessment attained finality and could not be enhanced in appeal merely because the statute refers to variation &quot;otherwise&quot;. Reopening a final assessment at a higher rate lay under section 21, while suo motu revision belonged to the Commissioner under section 10-B. The appellate enhancement on the unappealed portion was therefore without jurisdiction and invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>