<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 304 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154808</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to exemption on the turnover of Rs. 54,000 related to the sale of handmade matches. The petition was dismissed as the exemption granted by the Government only covered the manufacturer&#039;s sale and not subsequent sales, making the petitioner&#039;s sale the first taxable sale inside the State and liable for taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:18:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 304 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154808</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the petitioner was not entitled to exemption on the turnover of Rs. 54,000 related to the sale of handmade matches. The petition was dismissed as the exemption granted by the Government only covered the manufacturer&#039;s sale and not subsequent sales, making the petitioner&#039;s sale the first taxable sale inside the State and liable for taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>