<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 355 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154807</link>
    <description>Assessment jurisdiction under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and Rules is controlled by the statutory allocation of authority and the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdictional notifications. Where a dealer fell within the special circle jurisdiction of the Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Jodhpur, the Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer (Anti-Evasion), Bikaner could not assume assessing authority status for a best judgment assessment without a specific order under rule 52 conferring that power. The court held that the notification relied on by the revenue did not authorise such jurisdiction, so the assessment was without lawful authority and liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:15:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 355 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154807</link>
      <description>Assessment jurisdiction under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and Rules is controlled by the statutory allocation of authority and the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdictional notifications. Where a dealer fell within the special circle jurisdiction of the Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Jodhpur, the Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer (Anti-Evasion), Bikaner could not assume assessing authority status for a best judgment assessment without a specific order under rule 52 conferring that power. The court held that the notification relied on by the revenue did not authorise such jurisdiction, so the assessment was without lawful authority and liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>