<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 360 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154785</link>
    <description>For exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the goods purchased and the goods exported must be the same commodity. Removal of skin, washing, cleaning and freezing did not change the character, identity or commercial understanding of frog legs in common parlance; the processed form remained the same goods, merely made fit for consumption and preserved against decomposition. The assessee was therefore entitled to the section 5(3) exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 360 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154785</link>
      <description>For exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, the goods purchased and the goods exported must be the same commodity. Removal of skin, washing, cleaning and freezing did not change the character, identity or commercial understanding of frog legs in common parlance; the processed form remained the same goods, merely made fit for consumption and preserved against decomposition. The assessee was therefore entitled to the section 5(3) exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>