https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154767 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Brass Extruded Rods and Bars, in a Central Excise duty dispute. The Tribunal ruled that the differential purchase tax paid post-detection need not be included in the assessable value for duty calculation. It emphasized the need for evidence of passing on the purchase tax burden to customers for duty demand post the 2000 amendment. The Tribunal overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154767 The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of Brass Extruded Rods and Bars, in a Central Excise duty dispute. The Tribunal ruled that the differential purchase tax paid post-detection need not be included in the assessable value for duty calculation. It emphasized the need for evidence of passing on the purchase tax burden to customers for duty demand post the 2000 amendment. The Tribunal overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeal and providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154767