<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 738 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154764</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Application for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal due to insufficient evidence provided by the Applicant regarding the sudden illness of the Advocate&#039;s clerk. The lack of a Medical Certificate, affidavit, and essential details led to the rejection of the request. The judgment emphasizes the requirement for concrete evidence to support requests for condonation of delay in legal proceedings, highlighting the importance of meeting the burden of proof and providing comprehensive justifications for delays in filing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 738 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154764</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Application for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal due to insufficient evidence provided by the Applicant regarding the sudden illness of the Advocate&#039;s clerk. The lack of a Medical Certificate, affidavit, and essential details led to the rejection of the request. The judgment emphasizes the requirement for concrete evidence to support requests for condonation of delay in legal proceedings, highlighting the importance of meeting the burden of proof and providing comprehensive justifications for delays in filing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>