<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 733 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154753</link>
    <description>The judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the confirmation of redemption fine and penalties imposed on imported goods misdeclared under the DEEC Scheme as &quot;Natural Rubber SVR 10.&quot; The appellant had taken necessary precautions, did not intentionally violate any provisions, and had no malicious intent. The judge emphasized the appellant&#039;s due diligence and distinguished the case from precedents cited by the Departmental Representative. Relying on legal precedents, the judge concluded that the redemption fine and penalty were not justified in this instance, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 733 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154753</link>
      <description>The judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the confirmation of redemption fine and penalties imposed on imported goods misdeclared under the DEEC Scheme as &quot;Natural Rubber SVR 10.&quot; The appellant had taken necessary precautions, did not intentionally violate any provisions, and had no malicious intent. The judge emphasized the appellant&#039;s due diligence and distinguished the case from precedents cited by the Departmental Representative. Relying on legal precedents, the judge concluded that the redemption fine and penalty were not justified in this instance, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>