<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 947 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154752</link>
    <description>Duty could not be demanded for the period covered by an approved classification list that had been sustained by the Tribunal and had attained finality. For the later period, printed boxes made of mill board with kraft paper pasted on them did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 279/82-C.E., because the notification applied only to goods made wholly out of mill board and the pasted paper meant that condition was not met. Penalty under Section 11AC and interest under Sections 11AA and 11AB were unsustainable where the relevant provisions were not invoked in the notice or were inapplicable to the period in question; the matter was remitted only for re-quantification of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 947 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154752</link>
      <description>Duty could not be demanded for the period covered by an approved classification list that had been sustained by the Tribunal and had attained finality. For the later period, printed boxes made of mill board with kraft paper pasted on them did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 279/82-C.E., because the notification applied only to goods made wholly out of mill board and the pasted paper meant that condition was not met. Penalty under Section 11AC and interest under Sections 11AA and 11AB were unsustainable where the relevant provisions were not invoked in the notice or were inapplicable to the period in question; the matter was remitted only for re-quantification of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>