<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 341 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154735</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court dismissed the revision filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the rejection of account books and estimation of turnover for the assessment year 1978-79. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s account books and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s appeal challenging the reduction in turnover. The Court found no merit in the Commissioner&#039;s argument for rehearing both appeals together based on the doctrine of merger, as the circumstances differed from the cited Supreme Court decision. Ultimately, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that there was no error of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 18:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 341 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154735</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court dismissed the revision filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax against the Sales Tax Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the rejection of account books and estimation of turnover for the assessment year 1978-79. The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s account books and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s appeal challenging the reduction in turnover. The Court found no merit in the Commissioner&#039;s argument for rehearing both appeals together based on the doctrine of merger, as the circumstances differed from the cited Supreme Court decision. Ultimately, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that there was no error of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>