<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (2) TMI 486 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154719</link>
    <description>Cross appeals should be heard together and disposed of by a common judgment where the parties so agree, to avoid inconsistent or difficult-to-manage outcomes. Separate orders passed at different stages were treated as unsuitable in that setting, and the matters were restored for fresh disposal by the Tribunal through a common order on the same day according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:06:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (2) TMI 486 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154719</link>
      <description>Cross appeals should be heard together and disposed of by a common judgment where the parties so agree, to avoid inconsistent or difficult-to-manage outcomes. Separate orders passed at different stages were treated as unsuitable in that setting, and the matters were restored for fresh disposal by the Tribunal through a common order on the same day according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>