https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154693 A State Level Committee implementing an incentive scheme could not reduce or supersede incentive limits fixed by Government Orders issued by the competent authority. The committee had only an /implementation role, and no valid later Government Order cancelling or modifying the original orders was shown. In the absence of supersession, the Government remained bound by the existing incentive regime, and the petitioner's entitlement to an interest-free sales tax loan had to be examined under those original orders. The petitioner was therefore entitled to reconsideration of its claim on that basis, and the committee's reduction could not stand. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154693 A State Level Committee implementing an incentive scheme could not reduce or supersede incentive limits fixed by Government Orders issued by the competent authority. The committee had only an /implementation role, and no valid later Government Order cancelling or modifying the original orders was shown. In the absence of supersession, the Government remained bound by the existing incentive regime, and the petitioner's entitlement to an interest-free sales tax loan had to be examined under those original orders. The petitioner was therefore entitled to reconsideration of its claim on that basis, and the committee's reduction could not stand. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 25 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154693