<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 335 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154682</link>
    <description>Tax-paid packing material used in goods sold in packed form was treated as deductible under section 2(r)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, when read harmoniously with the explanation to section 2(o), because the packed sale price included the packing material and the deduction provision could not be read so as to nullify that explanation. Penalty under section 43(1) was not invalid merely because no separate show-cause notice was issued, since a reasonable opportunity of hearing had already been afforded through the assessee&#039;s explanation at the assessment stage. The penalty issue survived only for reconsideration of quantum in light of the revised assessment basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 335 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154682</link>
      <description>Tax-paid packing material used in goods sold in packed form was treated as deductible under section 2(r)(ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, when read harmoniously with the explanation to section 2(o), because the packed sale price included the packing material and the deduction provision could not be read so as to nullify that explanation. Penalty under section 43(1) was not invalid merely because no separate show-cause notice was issued, since a reasonable opportunity of hearing had already been afforded through the assessee&#039;s explanation at the assessment stage. The penalty issue survived only for reconsideration of quantum in light of the revised assessment basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>