<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 371 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154674</link>
    <description>Penalty for issuing a cheque dishonoured for insufficiency of funds was found unwarranted where the assessee acted under a bona fide expectation of receiving funds, then promptly deposited the amount and paid interest after dishonour. The question whether the conduct was bona fide or mala fide was treated as one of fact, and the fiscal authority was required to exercise discretion after considering the assessee&#039;s explanation. As the Tribunal had examined the material and recorded a categorical finding of no mala fide, the penalty could not be sustained and the order did not call for interference in revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 371 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154674</link>
      <description>Penalty for issuing a cheque dishonoured for insufficiency of funds was found unwarranted where the assessee acted under a bona fide expectation of receiving funds, then promptly deposited the amount and paid interest after dishonour. The question whether the conduct was bona fide or mala fide was treated as one of fact, and the fiscal authority was required to exercise discretion after considering the assessee&#039;s explanation. As the Tribunal had examined the material and recorded a categorical finding of no mala fide, the penalty could not be sustained and the order did not call for interference in revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>