<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 338 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154673</link>
    <description>The commentary addresses interest-free sales tax loans under G.O. 224 and the effect of executive inaction on claims arising from a government incentive scheme. It notes that the State was directed to choose within eight weeks whether to issue an executive order, Ordinance, or other legislative measure to modify or withdraw the incentive framework, or otherwise proceed under the existing scheme. It also records that companies were permitted to submit claims for specified loan amounts, and the Government was required to decide those claims within three months. The text emphasises that entitlement was not finally determined on merits, but that administrative adjudication of claims and clear governmental action were required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:57:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 338 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154673</link>
      <description>The commentary addresses interest-free sales tax loans under G.O. 224 and the effect of executive inaction on claims arising from a government incentive scheme. It notes that the State was directed to choose within eight weeks whether to issue an executive order, Ordinance, or other legislative measure to modify or withdraw the incentive framework, or otherwise proceed under the existing scheme. It also records that companies were permitted to submit claims for specified loan amounts, and the Government was required to decide those claims within three months. The text emphasises that entitlement was not finally determined on merits, but that administrative adjudication of claims and clear governmental action were required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>