<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 793 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154667</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the appellant-revenue to inform the Tribunal about the Supreme Court&#039;s decision setting aside a judgment relied upon, leading to the need for rectification. The issues of interpreting specific rules and eligibility for Modvat credit on capital goods were briefly mentioned but not extensively analyzed, emphasizing the impact of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 793 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154667</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the appellant-revenue to inform the Tribunal about the Supreme Court&#039;s decision setting aside a judgment relied upon, leading to the need for rectification. The issues of interpreting specific rules and eligibility for Modvat credit on capital goods were briefly mentioned but not extensively analyzed, emphasizing the impact of the Supreme Court&#039;s decision on the Tribunal&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>