https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154655 Article 226 territorial jurisdiction depends on facts that form an integral part of the cause of action; mere residence, business presence, or receipt of correspondence at a place is insufficient where the contract, payments, and supply obligations are centered elsewhere, so the Calcutta High Court lacked jurisdiction. Section 3(7) of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983 leaves pre-take-over liabilities enforceable against the textile company itself, not against the Central Government or the Custodian, so the alleged liability could not be enforced against them. A writ petition was also not maintainable for supply of goods and refund because the claim turned on seriously disputed facts and a pure contractual dispute without a statutory duty. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154655 Article 226 territorial jurisdiction depends on facts that form an integral part of the cause of action; mere residence, business presence, or receipt of correspondence at a place is insufficient where the contract, payments, and supply obligations are centered elsewhere, so the Calcutta High Court lacked jurisdiction. Section 3(7) of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983 leaves pre-take-over liabilities enforceable against the textile company itself, not against the Central Government or the Custodian, so the alleged liability could not be enforced against them. A writ petition was also not maintainable for supply of goods and refund because the claim turned on seriously disputed facts and a pure contractual dispute without a statutory duty. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154655