<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1038 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154654</link>
    <description>Stamp duty under the Bombay Stamp Act attaches only to an instrument, and a bill of lading is excluded from the definition of instrument under Section 2(1) and outside Section 74. A bill of lading is a document of title, not a delivery order, and Article 24 therefore did not apply where imported cargo was delivered directly at a captive jetty without entrustment to the Port authorities or any delivery order. Bills of lading fall within the Union field under Entry 91 of List I, so the State lacked competence to impose stamp duty through the impugned circulars. The circulars were invalid insofar as they required stamp duty clearance for such direct deliveries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1038 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154654</link>
      <description>Stamp duty under the Bombay Stamp Act attaches only to an instrument, and a bill of lading is excluded from the definition of instrument under Section 2(1) and outside Section 74. A bill of lading is a document of title, not a delivery order, and Article 24 therefore did not apply where imported cargo was delivered directly at a captive jetty without entrustment to the Port authorities or any delivery order. Bills of lading fall within the Union field under Entry 91 of List I, so the State lacked competence to impose stamp duty through the impugned circulars. The circulars were invalid insofar as they required stamp duty clearance for such direct deliveries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>