<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 422 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154648</link>
    <description>A claim for exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act could not be finally rejected without examining whether the export was made in pursuance of a pre-existing contract. The assessment and appellate authorities had focused on the absence of bill of lading and Form H, but had not determined the foundational export requirement or allowed the assessee to prove that the State Trading Corporation export was contract-based. The matter was therefore remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 422 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154648</link>
      <description>A claim for exemption under section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act could not be finally rejected without examining whether the export was made in pursuance of a pre-existing contract. The assessment and appellate authorities had focused on the absence of bill of lading and Form H, but had not determined the foundational export requirement or allowed the assessee to prove that the State Trading Corporation export was contract-based. The matter was therefore remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>