<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 825 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154645</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as the Tribunal had remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for deciding on the redemption fine and penalty. The Court found that the Revenue could have raised the issue during the Respondent&#039;s appeal and concluded that the questions of law framed would not arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 825 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154645</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as the Tribunal had remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for deciding on the redemption fine and penalty. The Court found that the Revenue could have raised the issue during the Respondent&#039;s appeal and concluded that the questions of law framed would not arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>