<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 945 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154640</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit is described as available where duty-paid inputs are sent only for intermediate processing by a job worker and are received back for use in manufacturing the final product. The text notes that credit under the Cenvat Rules extends to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, including intermediate products processed on job work, and that denial based on the assessee not functioning as an independent texturiser was rejected. The decisive factors were duty-paid inputs, intermediate processing only, and final use in duty-paid goods; a narrow or technical construction was not applied when the substantive conditions were met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 945 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154640</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit is described as available where duty-paid inputs are sent only for intermediate processing by a job worker and are received back for use in manufacturing the final product. The text notes that credit under the Cenvat Rules extends to inputs used in or in relation to manufacture, including intermediate products processed on job work, and that denial based on the assessee not functioning as an independent texturiser was rejected. The decisive factors were duty-paid inputs, intermediate processing only, and final use in duty-paid goods; a narrow or technical construction was not applied when the substantive conditions were met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>