<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 454 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154629</link>
    <description>Raw materials purchased against a registration certificate for declared manufacturing use cannot be subjected to tax under the second proviso to section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 merely because manufacture took place outside Delhi and the finished goods were also sold outside Delhi. The governing principle, drawn from Polestar Electronic, is that goods acquired pursuant to the certificate and used for the declared purpose remain within that purpose; territorial location of manufacture or sale does not by itself create tax liability under the proviso. The assessment based on such levy was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 454 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154629</link>
      <description>Raw materials purchased against a registration certificate for declared manufacturing use cannot be subjected to tax under the second proviso to section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 merely because manufacture took place outside Delhi and the finished goods were also sold outside Delhi. The governing principle, drawn from Polestar Electronic, is that goods acquired pursuant to the certificate and used for the declared purpose remain within that purpose; territorial location of manufacture or sale does not by itself create tax liability under the proviso. The assessment based on such levy was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>