https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154617 A writ petition challenging a tax demand notice for recovery of penalty and interest was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available. The High Court declined to examine the merits of the Commercial Taxes Officer's order under article 226, leaving the petitioners to pursue appeal. The court also noted that the constitutional validity of section 9(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act had already been upheld by the Supreme Court, so that challenge did not survive for consideration. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:48:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154617 A writ petition challenging a tax demand notice for recovery of penalty and interest was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available. The High Court declined to examine the merits of the Commercial Taxes Officer's order under article 226, leaving the petitioners to pursue appeal. The court also noted that the constitutional validity of section 9(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act had already been upheld by the Supreme Court, so that challenge did not survive for consideration. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 20 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154617