https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154607 Interference under article 226 against a show cause notice issued under section 22-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was held unwarranted at the notice stage. The Court noted that the Full Bench had already rejected the challenge to the scope and constitutional validity of section 22-A, but the petitioner could still argue before the Commissioner that the appellate order did not justify revision under that provision. Whether the notice was justified, and the relevance of the cited Orissa decision, were matters for the Commissioner to examine first. In the absence of a concluded adverse order, the writ petition was not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:14:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154607 Interference under article 226 against a show cause notice issued under section 22-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was held unwarranted at the notice stage. The Court noted that the Full Bench had already rejected the challenge to the scope and constitutional validity of section 22-A, but the petitioner could still argue before the Commissioner that the appellate order did not justify revision under that provision. Whether the notice was justified, and the relevance of the cited Orissa decision, were matters for the Commissioner to examine first. In the absence of a concluded adverse order, the writ petition was not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 23 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154607