https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154598 Dismissal or withdrawal of a special leave petition by a non-speaking order does not amount to affirmation of the challenged judgment, does not attract merger, and does not create res judicata; only a merits decision after leave is granted can do so. Article 14 does not permit negative equality, so an allottee cannot claim the benefit of another person's erroneous or irregular relief. The statutory allotment scheme also permitted fixation of tentative price and recovery of additional price, and the pricing was not shown to be arbitrary or unsupported by the rules. The impugned demand was therefore upheld. en-us Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Dec 2013 13:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154598 Dismissal or withdrawal of a special leave petition by a non-speaking order does not amount to affirmation of the challenged judgment, does not attract merger, and does not create res judicata; only a merits decision after leave is granted can do so. Article 14 does not permit negative equality, so an allottee cannot claim the benefit of another person's erroneous or irregular relief. The statutory allotment scheme also permitted fixation of tentative price and recovery of additional price, and the pricing was not shown to be arbitrary or unsupported by the rules. The impugned demand was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154598