<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 273 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154597</link>
    <description>Rejection of books of account cannot rest on conjecture where survey findings do not disclose the source or particulars of the alleged adverse information. The assessee&#039;s books were rejected because the shop was found closed during survey and it was inferred that grain transactions had occurred at night, but the orders below did not explain the basis of that inference. In the absence of a disclosed factual foundation, a best judgment assessment was not justified. Alleged penalty proceedings, which did not survive, also could not validate the rejection. The books of account were therefore treated as acceptable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:43:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 273 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154597</link>
      <description>Rejection of books of account cannot rest on conjecture where survey findings do not disclose the source or particulars of the alleged adverse information. The assessee&#039;s books were rejected because the shop was found closed during survey and it was inferred that grain transactions had occurred at night, but the orders below did not explain the basis of that inference. In the absence of a disclosed factual foundation, a best judgment assessment was not justified. Alleged penalty proceedings, which did not survive, also could not validate the rejection. The books of account were therefore treated as acceptable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>