<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 857 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154595</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay of 59 days in filing the appeal before the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court. The Court held that a sufficient cause was established for condonation, emphasizing the absence of negligence, inaction, or mala fides on the part of the appellants. It discussed the need for a liberal approach in such cases and highlighted the importance of advancing substantial justice. The judgment also addressed the application of legal principles for Government entities&#039; appeals, stressing the necessity of flexibility to prevent miscarriage of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 857 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154595</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay of 59 days in filing the appeal before the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court. The Court held that a sufficient cause was established for condonation, emphasizing the absence of negligence, inaction, or mala fides on the part of the appellants. It discussed the need for a liberal approach in such cases and highlighted the importance of advancing substantial justice. The judgment also addressed the application of legal principles for Government entities&#039; appeals, stressing the necessity of flexibility to prevent miscarriage of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>