<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 210 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154585</link>
    <description>Reimbursement received by a vehicle dealer from the manufacturer for warranty replacement of spare parts and for pre-delivery charges was held not to be a taxable sale under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The dealer merely facilitated the manufacturer&#039;s warranty obligation and acted to place vehicles in saleable condition; no independent transfer of property in goods for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration occurred within section 2(n). The reimbursement therefore covered warranty-related replacement and pre-delivery expenses, but did not amount to a sale of parts, labour or repairs, and was outside the charging concept of sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 210 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154585</link>
      <description>Reimbursement received by a vehicle dealer from the manufacturer for warranty replacement of spare parts and for pre-delivery charges was held not to be a taxable sale under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The dealer merely facilitated the manufacturer&#039;s warranty obligation and acted to place vehicles in saleable condition; no independent transfer of property in goods for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration occurred within section 2(n). The reimbursement therefore covered warranty-related replacement and pre-delivery expenses, but did not amount to a sale of parts, labour or repairs, and was outside the charging concept of sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>