<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 298 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154581</link>
    <description>Polishing of stones was held not to amount to &quot;manufacture&quot; under section 2(k) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, because the process did not create a new commercial commodity with a distinct name, character or use. The essential test applied was whether the article retained its commercial identity after treatment; as the polished stones remained the same goods in substance, mere labour or processing was insufficient. As a result, concessional tax under section 5C was not available on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 298 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154581</link>
      <description>Polishing of stones was held not to amount to &quot;manufacture&quot; under section 2(k) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, because the process did not create a new commercial commodity with a distinct name, character or use. The essential test applied was whether the article retained its commercial identity after treatment; as the polished stones remained the same goods in substance, mere labour or processing was insufficient. As a result, concessional tax under section 5C was not available on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>