<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 366 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154566</link>
    <description>A Government resolution extending an earlier sales tax incentive scheme to 30 September 1979 was held to continue the exemption for a small-scale unit that began production on 22 August 1979. The earlier scheme contained no cut-off date restricting commencement of production, and the later resolution expressly carried forward the operative incentives. The objection that the resolution was not a valid notification failed because Gazette publication of a formal resolution issued in the Governor&#039;s name amounted to substantial compliance with the statutory notification requirement. Exemption provisions were also to be construed liberally in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:42:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 366 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154566</link>
      <description>A Government resolution extending an earlier sales tax incentive scheme to 30 September 1979 was held to continue the exemption for a small-scale unit that began production on 22 August 1979. The earlier scheme contained no cut-off date restricting commencement of production, and the later resolution expressly carried forward the operative incentives. The objection that the resolution was not a valid notification failed because Gazette publication of a formal resolution issued in the Governor&#039;s name amounted to substantial compliance with the statutory notification requirement. Exemption provisions were also to be construed liberally in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>