<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154556</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in tax revision cases involving the State Trading Corporation&#039;s taxable turnovers for assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81. The Court determined that transactions with Civil Supplies Corporations were agency transactions, not inter-State sales as contended by the revenue. Emphasizing the agreement&#039;s terms, the Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s argument and highlighted the distinction between sales and agency contracts. The judgment affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the importance of agreement provisions in determining transaction nature and rejecting interference in the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:52:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 295 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154556</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in tax revision cases involving the State Trading Corporation&#039;s taxable turnovers for assessment years 1979-80 and 1980-81. The Court determined that transactions with Civil Supplies Corporations were agency transactions, not inter-State sales as contended by the revenue. Emphasizing the agreement&#039;s terms, the Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s argument and highlighted the distinction between sales and agency contracts. The judgment affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the importance of agreement provisions in determining transaction nature and rejecting interference in the Tribunal&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>