<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 287 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154539</link>
    <description>Under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, revisional power may be exercised either on an aggrieved party&#039;s application or by the authority on its own motion, but the two routes are distinct. A party&#039;s request asking the revisional authority to act suo motu does not become a true suo motu proceeding, especially where the assessment order was appealable. Such a request cannot be used to bypass the statutory revision scheme, the appeal mechanism, or the limitation applicable to a revisional application. The revisional authority was therefore entitled to treat the matter as not maintainable in that form, and the statutory revision was not revived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 287 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154539</link>
      <description>Under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, revisional power may be exercised either on an aggrieved party&#039;s application or by the authority on its own motion, but the two routes are distinct. A party&#039;s request asking the revisional authority to act suo motu does not become a true suo motu proceeding, especially where the assessment order was appealable. Such a request cannot be used to bypass the statutory revision scheme, the appeal mechanism, or the limitation applicable to a revisional application. The revisional authority was therefore entitled to treat the matter as not maintainable in that form, and the statutory revision was not revived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>