https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154525 Employees placed with Gram Panchayats under Section 25 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act were treated as deputationists, because their pay, service conditions, disciplinary control, promotion and lien continued to remain with their parent departments. The statutory use of the term "transfer" was regarded as a misnomer, and repatriation to the parent cadre was held legally permissible since deputation does not confer a right to remain indefinitely in the borrowing establishment. The contrary High Court directions quashing the Government Orders and directing permanency could not be sustained, as they conflicted with binding precedent and service-law principles. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154525 Employees placed with Gram Panchayats under Section 25 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act were treated as deputationists, because their pay, service conditions, disciplinary control, promotion and lien continued to remain with their parent departments. The statutory use of the term "transfer" was regarded as a misnomer, and repatriation to the parent cadre was held legally permissible since deputation does not confer a right to remain indefinitely in the borrowing establishment. The contrary High Court directions quashing the Government Orders and directing permanency could not be sustained, as they conflicted with binding precedent and service-law principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154525