<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 273 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154511</link>
    <description>Cleaning and washing waste fibre with chemicals, followed by cutting it into pieces, was held not to amount to manufacture under section 2(j) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because the process did not bring into existence a new commercial commodity with a distinct identity. The court reasoned that the definition of manufacture is wide, but it still requires transformation into a different product; merely removing dirt, improving condition, or enhancing value while the material remains essentially the same article is insufficient. The Tribunal&#039;s view was therefore rejected, and the process was treated as outside the scope of manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 273 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154511</link>
      <description>Cleaning and washing waste fibre with chemicals, followed by cutting it into pieces, was held not to amount to manufacture under section 2(j) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because the process did not bring into existence a new commercial commodity with a distinct identity. The court reasoned that the definition of manufacture is wide, but it still requires transformation into a different product; merely removing dirt, improving condition, or enhancing value while the material remains essentially the same article is insufficient. The Tribunal&#039;s view was therefore rejected, and the process was treated as outside the scope of manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>