<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 292 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154506</link>
    <description>Freight charges formed part of the assessee&#039;s taxable turnover under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, so no exemption was available on that basis. The Court held that the Tribunal had rightly excluded dharmada and correctly applied the definition of purchase price in section 2(gg), which supported inclusion of freight in the turnover. The assessee&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the turnover computation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 292 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154506</link>
      <description>Freight charges formed part of the assessee&#039;s taxable turnover under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, so no exemption was available on that basis. The Court held that the Tribunal had rightly excluded dharmada and correctly applied the definition of purchase price in section 2(gg), which supported inclusion of freight in the turnover. The assessee&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the turnover computation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>