<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 285 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154487</link>
    <description>Arrears of sales tax recoverable as arrears of land revenue could be pursued through the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890, and sections 3 and 5 were read together to permit the Collector to initiate recovery and transmit the certificate for enforcement in the district where recovery was to be made. The Act also allowed the Collector to delegate the signing of the certificate under section 3(2). Because the officer who signed the certificate had been authorised by the Collector of Bombay, the certificate was not invalid merely for being signed on the Collector&#039;s behalf. The challenge to the recovery proceedings therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 285 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154487</link>
      <description>Arrears of sales tax recoverable as arrears of land revenue could be pursued through the Revenue Recovery Act, 1890, and sections 3 and 5 were read together to permit the Collector to initiate recovery and transmit the certificate for enforcement in the district where recovery was to be made. The Act also allowed the Collector to delegate the signing of the certificate under section 3(2). Because the officer who signed the certificate had been authorised by the Collector of Bombay, the certificate was not invalid merely for being signed on the Collector&#039;s behalf. The challenge to the recovery proceedings therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>