<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 263 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154465</link>
    <description>The court held that transportation charges for naphtha should not be included in the sale price for calculating Central sales tax. It was determined that these charges were distinct and should be excluded from the turnover computation. Consequently, sums collected by the Bihar sales tax authorities on transportation charges were deemed refundable. The issue of Central sales tax on excise duty was not addressed as it was not pressed during the hearing. The court denied the refund request due to lack of specific prayer and absence of necessary documentation but allowed the petitioner to reapply with proper materials. The application succeeded, leading to the quashing of assessment orders and directing reassessment in line with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 263 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154465</link>
      <description>The court held that transportation charges for naphtha should not be included in the sale price for calculating Central sales tax. It was determined that these charges were distinct and should be excluded from the turnover computation. Consequently, sums collected by the Bihar sales tax authorities on transportation charges were deemed refundable. The issue of Central sales tax on excise duty was not addressed as it was not pressed during the hearing. The court denied the refund request due to lack of specific prayer and absence of necessary documentation but allowed the petitioner to reapply with proper materials. The application succeeded, leading to the quashing of assessment orders and directing reassessment in line with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>