<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154464</link>
    <description>Where statutory declaration forms are tied to bona fide commercial use and revenue protection, the authority may withhold further ST-1 forms and require additional security if recorded material suggests misuse, inflated or interpolated declarations, collusion, or other conduct prejudicial to tax realisation. Section 18 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 and Rule 8(4)(a) of the Delhi Sales Tax Rules were treated as enabling preventive action, including refusal of forms or issue of fewer forms where bona fides are not shown. The dealer had to be heard on the security demand, but the challenge failed and the protective action was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154464</link>
      <description>Where statutory declaration forms are tied to bona fide commercial use and revenue protection, the authority may withhold further ST-1 forms and require additional security if recorded material suggests misuse, inflated or interpolated declarations, collusion, or other conduct prejudicial to tax realisation. Section 18 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 and Rule 8(4)(a) of the Delhi Sales Tax Rules were treated as enabling preventive action, including refusal of forms or issue of fewer forms where bona fides are not shown. The dealer had to be heard on the security demand, but the challenge failed and the protective action was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>