<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 233 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154462</link>
    <description>For sales tax classification, the product&#039;s essential character and common market understanding controlled its entry. Roshan Shital Tail was treated as hair oil because it was marketed and used mainly for application to human hair, and its carton described benefits for dandruff, hair fall, baldness, and greying. The presence of herbs or claimed therapeutic effects did not convert it into a medicine. A preparation intended principally for hair remains a toilet article or cosmetics item even if it has some medicinal properties, so the product fell within the notification as hair oil and not medicine, with the revision succeeding for the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=171493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 233 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154462</link>
      <description>For sales tax classification, the product&#039;s essential character and common market understanding controlled its entry. Roshan Shital Tail was treated as hair oil because it was marketed and used mainly for application to human hair, and its carton described benefits for dandruff, hair fall, baldness, and greying. The presence of herbs or claimed therapeutic effects did not convert it into a medicine. A preparation intended principally for hair remains a toilet article or cosmetics item even if it has some medicinal properties, so the product fell within the notification as hair oil and not medicine, with the revision succeeding for the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=154462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>